Stop buying from BP. They may or may not be any worse than any other giant oil company, but they are the one that did the damage and will never truly pay the price for the clean up.
Transfer your $ to smaller, community based banks. They know who you are and actually care about your business. If you're using Citicorp or Chase or BOA, you are an insignificant number to them, with no clout and no voice.
Stop buying from Walmart. In 2002/2003 they began a huge national ad campaign, "Buy American", at the same time they began to systematically transfer about 300 billion dollars in purchasing a year overseas. Sure, they lowered costs, forcing others to follow - the result is that they decimated manufacturing in this country to our detriment. I'd rather pay $50 more for a TV and have 6% unemployment.
Stop eating fast food. If you haven't seen the documentaries or read the books - do so immediately. You'll never eat another McNugget or fast food burger again. Read Michael Pollan. Read Gary Taubes. Change your diet and become healthier. The best thing we can all do to combat health care costs is to become healthier.
Stop making excuses for the lunacy of the tea party. Call it like you see it. Stop pandering, stop excusing, stop feeling sorry for them, or guilty feeling superior to these dangerous fools. The real crux of the tea partiers are Ted Kaczynski types, or the tax cheats that haven't filed in 20 years, or the militia members waiting for their chance to shoot some people over their stash of bottled water, or the klan members, neo-nazis, or john birchers - all whom cannot believe we have a black president. They're a collection of fools, dolts, idiots, reprobates, and low intellect morons that vote against their own self interest. It's Darwin at his finest - left up to their own devices, they would be extinct in no time.
This is in no way a condemnation of true conservative philosophy. People that believe in smaller government, low taxes, few regulations, aggressive foreign policy, etc. have a real basis for those views, and they are defensible positions. There may be some true conservatives in that party, but they are simply using the fools to promote their agenda. The problem is, there is no way to control or educate these idiots - so while they may seem to be on your team, they aren't.
Monday, October 18, 2010
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
A New Party
It's time.
Time for a real, powerful, astute, wealthy, aggressive, 3rd political party that exists only for the benefit of the populous.
I'm sick of the incredible weakness and ineptitude of the Democrats, along with their watered down do nothing fixes for serious issues, obviously bowing to the big moneyed interests and seas of lobbyists, among other conflicts of interest.
I'm sick of listening to know nothing intellectually retarded zealots that seem to be taking over the Republican party. What's next for the platform - stop teaching math and science and replace it with wiccan theory? A crackpot is a crackpot - why is the Republican party allowing this abomination? Carl Rove actually came out viciously ( and rightfully so), against these idiot candidates, but was silenced immediately.
The current state of 3rd party efforts isn't worth discussing. Since Ross Perot, there hasn't been a serious threat to either party. They're relegated to spoiler status - who are they taking more votes away from - never a serious contender.
Why not a platform with lofty goals and the promise to utilize the greatest minds of our generation to achieve those goals? Why is it seemingly so impossible? I believe if people banded together with these common goals, it could all be achieved and in a short period of time. The status quo only suits those in power.
PEACE - We will not become involved in any war unless we are threatened or attacked.
PROSPERITY -Raise the minimum income level of all citizens. Keep taxes to a minimum. Full employment.
HEALTH - Cure cancer. Reduce life threatening diseases. Change US diets. Limit pollution.
FREEDOM - Let people do what they want as long as they don't harm others
INDEPENDENCE - Oil/energy. Food/water. Technology.
Keep a strong defense deterrent. Keep your guns.
Bring the manufacturing facilities back here. Bring the service facilities back here.
Stay healthier. Reduce the need for health care - reducing the cost dramatically.
Tax credits for gym memberships, not free scooters from medicare.
Drugs are a medical issue. Keep your pot. Prisons are for violent offenders and thieves.
Energy Independence now.
Everyone wants to be independent of the Arab oil producers - so let's actually do it. People will participate, people want to participate. Tax credits for hybrids and electric cars. Build more nuclear plants. Reward new, more efficient solar, wind, and battery powered technology.
Reward ingenuity. Reward volunteers. Reward hard work. Reward making intelligent choices.
Minimize abortion through education, adoption, and new medical technology.
Eliminate waste and fraud. Real solutions to cut ridiculous programs and circumvent government fraud.
I believe it's time to start a national movement to truly take our country back. Who is the transformational persona that can mobilize the people to make this happen? Where is he or she? I'm looking for a volunteer.
Time for a real, powerful, astute, wealthy, aggressive, 3rd political party that exists only for the benefit of the populous.
I'm sick of the incredible weakness and ineptitude of the Democrats, along with their watered down do nothing fixes for serious issues, obviously bowing to the big moneyed interests and seas of lobbyists, among other conflicts of interest.
I'm sick of listening to know nothing intellectually retarded zealots that seem to be taking over the Republican party. What's next for the platform - stop teaching math and science and replace it with wiccan theory? A crackpot is a crackpot - why is the Republican party allowing this abomination? Carl Rove actually came out viciously ( and rightfully so), against these idiot candidates, but was silenced immediately.
The current state of 3rd party efforts isn't worth discussing. Since Ross Perot, there hasn't been a serious threat to either party. They're relegated to spoiler status - who are they taking more votes away from - never a serious contender.
Why not a platform with lofty goals and the promise to utilize the greatest minds of our generation to achieve those goals? Why is it seemingly so impossible? I believe if people banded together with these common goals, it could all be achieved and in a short period of time. The status quo only suits those in power.
PEACE - We will not become involved in any war unless we are threatened or attacked.
PROSPERITY -Raise the minimum income level of all citizens. Keep taxes to a minimum. Full employment.
HEALTH - Cure cancer. Reduce life threatening diseases. Change US diets. Limit pollution.
FREEDOM - Let people do what they want as long as they don't harm others
INDEPENDENCE - Oil/energy. Food/water. Technology.
Keep a strong defense deterrent. Keep your guns.
Bring the manufacturing facilities back here. Bring the service facilities back here.
Stay healthier. Reduce the need for health care - reducing the cost dramatically.
Tax credits for gym memberships, not free scooters from medicare.
Drugs are a medical issue. Keep your pot. Prisons are for violent offenders and thieves.
Energy Independence now.
Everyone wants to be independent of the Arab oil producers - so let's actually do it. People will participate, people want to participate. Tax credits for hybrids and electric cars. Build more nuclear plants. Reward new, more efficient solar, wind, and battery powered technology.
Reward ingenuity. Reward volunteers. Reward hard work. Reward making intelligent choices.
Minimize abortion through education, adoption, and new medical technology.
Eliminate waste and fraud. Real solutions to cut ridiculous programs and circumvent government fraud.
I believe it's time to start a national movement to truly take our country back. Who is the transformational persona that can mobilize the people to make this happen? Where is he or she? I'm looking for a volunteer.
Monday, October 4, 2010
Dull As Taxes
Yes, how clever, but truly what is as dull as a discussion of the benefits of higher or lower taxes, yet most people have little or no knowledge of the impact these decisions have on their everyday lives, and never really consider the consequences of a politicians tax positions.
Alan Greenspan recently was quoted stating that tax cuts for the wealthy are not paid for. Meaning that any tax cut given to the wealthiest 2% of us will directly increase our national debt - which means that all of us will share in paying the ultra wealthy their tax credit.
The argument is that these wealthy individuals are primarily small business owners and that they will plow that money back into the economy via business expansion which creates jobs. If that were truly the argument, I would be in favor of these tax cuts, ONLY IF these individuals were required to reinvest these funds into US employment creation; opening factories, opening stores, opening warehouses, investing in new research and development, new technologies - you get the idea. But of course, that's not really the argument for these tax cuts is it?
The tax cut you give to one person earning 100 million a year, could amount to a tax cut of nearly $4000 for about 1000 average taxpayers. My contention is that the tax cut for the wealthy individual creates virtually nothing for the economy. That additional tax cut simply gets reinvested and saved. However, the $4000 tax cut for the average taxpayer would create a positive economic impact. Those consumers will spend much of that money on clothing, vacations, cars, home improvements, electronics, to name a few. Simply put, greater demand for goods and services will create more employment opportunities, which create more demand for goods and services - a great vicious cycle. The wealthy individual may buy a 3rd home or a 12th car, but he won't be buying 2000 plasma TV's or 4000 pairs of shoes.
In addition, the average working taxpayer is paying about half their income to taxes - a number that is much too high. When you combine federal taxes, state taxes, property taxes, benefits taxes (soc.sec., medicare, etc), sales taxes, local municipalities taxes, it's no wonder that the national savings rates are so abysmal. While the average wealthy individual pays a much smaller percentage of their total income in taxes - primarily because of the great advantages built into the system by your politicians for these wealthy individuals. Why do you think the capital gains tax is currently so low? Why are businesses allowed to avoid taxes in such a myriad of ways? The answer is obvious - Political clout - politicians bought and paid for.
Don't misread this. I am a true capitalist. I love business. I want everyone to have the opportunity to accumulate wealth. I want the system to work better, to provide growth and opportunity for entrepreneurs and employment for everyone else. The "trickle down" theory doesn't work. If you want tax cuts for the wealthy - fine - let's tie it in to increasing employment. We do have taxation with representation. Let's use it to represent the will of all the people, not the will of just the wealthy.
Alan Greenspan recently was quoted stating that tax cuts for the wealthy are not paid for. Meaning that any tax cut given to the wealthiest 2% of us will directly increase our national debt - which means that all of us will share in paying the ultra wealthy their tax credit.
The argument is that these wealthy individuals are primarily small business owners and that they will plow that money back into the economy via business expansion which creates jobs. If that were truly the argument, I would be in favor of these tax cuts, ONLY IF these individuals were required to reinvest these funds into US employment creation; opening factories, opening stores, opening warehouses, investing in new research and development, new technologies - you get the idea. But of course, that's not really the argument for these tax cuts is it?
The tax cut you give to one person earning 100 million a year, could amount to a tax cut of nearly $4000 for about 1000 average taxpayers. My contention is that the tax cut for the wealthy individual creates virtually nothing for the economy. That additional tax cut simply gets reinvested and saved. However, the $4000 tax cut for the average taxpayer would create a positive economic impact. Those consumers will spend much of that money on clothing, vacations, cars, home improvements, electronics, to name a few. Simply put, greater demand for goods and services will create more employment opportunities, which create more demand for goods and services - a great vicious cycle. The wealthy individual may buy a 3rd home or a 12th car, but he won't be buying 2000 plasma TV's or 4000 pairs of shoes.
In addition, the average working taxpayer is paying about half their income to taxes - a number that is much too high. When you combine federal taxes, state taxes, property taxes, benefits taxes (soc.sec., medicare, etc), sales taxes, local municipalities taxes, it's no wonder that the national savings rates are so abysmal. While the average wealthy individual pays a much smaller percentage of their total income in taxes - primarily because of the great advantages built into the system by your politicians for these wealthy individuals. Why do you think the capital gains tax is currently so low? Why are businesses allowed to avoid taxes in such a myriad of ways? The answer is obvious - Political clout - politicians bought and paid for.
Don't misread this. I am a true capitalist. I love business. I want everyone to have the opportunity to accumulate wealth. I want the system to work better, to provide growth and opportunity for entrepreneurs and employment for everyone else. The "trickle down" theory doesn't work. If you want tax cuts for the wealthy - fine - let's tie it in to increasing employment. We do have taxation with representation. Let's use it to represent the will of all the people, not the will of just the wealthy.
Friday, October 1, 2010
Which Side Are You On?
I contend that there are no sides, only false differentials created to divide reasonable people.
Who objects to the following?
* Low Taxes
* Balanced Budget
* Strong Defense
* Equality Under The Law
* Some Social Safety Net
* Personal Freedom
* Capitalism With A Few Rules
* Clean, Healthy Environment
* Self Sufficient, Independent Of Foreign Interests
The poisonous discourse seems to be over a few explosive issues - all controlled by money and the media. I don't object to a smart perspective that is the direct opposite of my perspective. I do object to opinions rooted in either ignorance or stupidity. I believe that the ensuing political battles to come will not be over the big ideas we all can agree on, but on the audacity of the stupid - suggesting hopelessly lugubrious solutions to serious, complex issues. I don't object to Republican, Democrat, or Independent. I object to stupidity and the recent rise in star quality fools.
Who objects to the following?
* Low Taxes
* Balanced Budget
* Strong Defense
* Equality Under The Law
* Some Social Safety Net
* Personal Freedom
* Capitalism With A Few Rules
* Clean, Healthy Environment
* Self Sufficient, Independent Of Foreign Interests
The poisonous discourse seems to be over a few explosive issues - all controlled by money and the media. I don't object to a smart perspective that is the direct opposite of my perspective. I do object to opinions rooted in either ignorance or stupidity. I believe that the ensuing political battles to come will not be over the big ideas we all can agree on, but on the audacity of the stupid - suggesting hopelessly lugubrious solutions to serious, complex issues. I don't object to Republican, Democrat, or Independent. I object to stupidity and the recent rise in star quality fools.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)